Publication | Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics 2016

Shape optimisation with multiresolution subdivision surfaces and immersed finite elements

This paper describes a generative design method using shells and immersed solvers – two methods that are very applicable to generative design in manufacturing but not yet available at Autodesk. The lead author implemented some of the existing generative design methods at Autodesk.

Download publication

Abstract

Shape optimisation with multiresolution subdivision surfaces and immersed finite elements

Kosala Bandara, Thomas Rüberg, Fehmi Cirak

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics 2016

We develop a new optimisation technique that combines multiresolution subdivision surfaces for boundary description with immersed finite elements for the discretisation of the primal and adjoint problems of optimisation. Similar to wavelets, multiresolution surfaces represent the domain boundary using a coarse control mesh and a sequence of detail vectors. Based on the multiresolution decomposition efficient and fast algorithms are available for reconstructing control meshes of varying fineness. During shape optimisation the vertex coordinates of control meshes are updated using the computed shape gradient information. By virtue of the multiresolution editing semantics, updating the coarse control mesh vertex coordinates leads to large-scale geometry changes and, conversely, updating the fine control mesh coordinates leads to small-scale geometry changes. In our computations we start by optimising the coarsest control mesh and refine it each time the cost function reaches a minimum. This approach effectively prevents the appearance of non-physical boundary geometry oscillations and control mesh pathologies, like inverted elements. Independent of the fineness of the control mesh used for optimisation, on the immersed finite element grid the domain boundary is always represented with a relatively fine control mesh of fixed resolution. With the immersed finite element method there is no need to maintain an analysis suitable domain mesh. In some of the presented two and three-dimensional elasticity examples the topology derivative is used for introducing new holes inside the domain. The merging or removing of holes is not considered.

Related Resources

Article

2023

A Boomerang Intern Reflects on His Time at Autodesk

A returning intern reflects on his experiences at Autodesk…

Publication

2014

Earth mover’s distances on discrete surfaces

We introduce a novel method for computing the earth mover’s distance…

Publication

2001

An Illumination Model For a Skin Layer Bounded by Rough Surfaces

In this paper we present a novel illumination model that takes into…

Publication

2009

Effective Analogical Transfer Using Biological Descriptions Retrieved with Functional and Biologically Meaningful Keywords

While biology is well recognized as a good source of analogies for…

Get in touch

Something pique your interest? Get in touch if you’d like to learn more about Autodesk Research, our projects, people, and potential collaboration opportunities.

Contact us